About Barnes & Conti

Our Trainers

Our Customers

Our Global Partners

Our U.S. Partners

Our Programs

Problem Solving

Distance Learning

Barnes & Conti Blog

Our Newsletter

Public Programs

Upcoming Events

What’s New Page

Exercising Influence

Innovation Management

Negotiation & Debate

Resource Library

Other Websites of Interest

More info
Share |

Follow Barnes & Conti on Facebook

Exercising
Influence®:

InfluenceOur globally- popular influence program is available in several languages.

Managing Innovation

Innovation Management

Our Managing Innovation™ program provides a process to get the best out of creative ideas.

Puzzles, Mysteries, and Muddles

Problem Solving

Puzzles, Mysteries, and Muddles is our newest program.

Negotiating in Project Management:
Typical Issues by Phase (excerpt)
B. Kim Barnes

Projects are built on agreements. To achieve outstanding business results, project managers and leaders must negotiate with sponsors or clients, customers, team members, and colleagues with key resources. Building effective project agreements requires the negotiators to find ways to meet the needs of all parties. A negotiation is neither a contest nor a debate. It is more like the process of creating a building with the other people who are going to have to live or work in it. The phases of negotiation are similar to the phases of designing and constructing a building.

Constructing a building is, of course, a big project. A few months after a building has been completed, architects hold a “post-occupancy evaluation.” They interview the people who live and work in the building. This provides the architects with good information about what works well and what is less successful—information they will use in designing their next project.

Negotiators would do well to adopt a similar “post-negotiation evaluation” practice, especially when they are in business relationships that require regular or frequent negotiation or close monitoring to be sure an agreement is being implemented on an ongoing basis. In fact, this kind of evaluation is done by many highly skilled negotiators. At some time before they need to begin a new round of negotiations, they meet with the other party or parties to discuss the merits and shortcomings of their previous agreement. The discussion should include both the content and the process of coming to agreement. The discussion and evaluation prepares them for the new negotiation, establishes a collaborative negotiation relationship, and keeps them engaged in continuous improvement. Even when their next similar negotiation is with other parties, the learning will be useful and all who participate will benefit if the discussion is limited to “what did we learn from the last negotiation?” rather than “whose fault is it that I didn’t get the result I wanted?”

Negotiation is often seen as a means to resolve conflict—but it is also one of the most important tools for its prevention. Ideally, negotiation with the project client or sponsor occurs early in the life of a project, thus preventing later conflicts and misunderstandings. Other negotiations will occur throughout the life of the project, from Initiation through Planning, Execution, Control, and Closeout.

Phase

Issues

Actions

Blueprint:
Planning

Lack of understanding about one’s own needs and those of the client

  • Use needs/options tool to plan
  • Have a preliminary meeting with client to elicit needs
  • Work with team to identify potential needs and options for all parties

Foundation: Developing rapport, setting agenda and groundrules

Lack of trust, unclear or unrealistic expectations on the part of any party

  • Acknowledge any past difficulties
  • Establish a positive vision of accomplishing results together
  • Agree on agenda and groundrules for negotiation

Framework: Communicating positions and needs

Lack of openness or poor communication about project goals and most important underlying needs

  • Use questioning and listening skills to draw out client and check your understanding
  • Summarize your understanding of all parties’ needs and goals, including any differences that need to be addressed
  • Send an e-memo after the meeting to reiterate your understanding

Infrastructure:
Finding ways to meet needs

Lack of flexibility or creativity about options to fulfill needs and achieve goals

  • Continue to ask for ideas and alternative ways of meeting needs before focusing on one solution
  • Offer exchanges or alternatives that meet underlying needs and are high value to the receiver and low cost to the giver

Closing:
Making the commitment

Difficulty in committing to final design or schedule

  • Use time pressure constructively by emphasizing benefits of reaching early agreement and educating clients about the costs of delay
  • Offer successively smaller concessions in exchange for agreements

Finishing: Implementing the agreement

Dealing with unanticipated or hidden problems

  • Invite client and team to suggest issues that could derail the process and how to address them
  • Plan for regular communication and troubleshooting meetings

 

© 2004 Barnes & Conti Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.